«
»

kjs finally under 1000 fails!

Hello again planet,

I finally got time to konquer the kjs world once more. I was kinda busy in the past month and I still am. Many month have past and kjs was still over 1000(1004) fails in the ECMAScript Testsuite. But finally I broke the 1000 fails border, with implementing Function.prototype.bind, there are now under 1000 fails, even better also under 900! „Only“ 895 fails now.

ecma-under-1000-min

But if you look more closely at those 895 fails… ~700 are from strict testcases, which is like no gain for the user, ~100 are some not deletable properties of the standard builtin Objects, minor gain in some special situations for the user, and ~50 are because of some special call usage with null and undefined, maybe minor gain. So overall kjs is not in a bad shape…. function wise…

But sadly… I couldn’t commit any patches, they are still waiting for review, so don’t be surprised if your konq still shows 4147 fails.
Anyway… hurray! personal goal reached! My patch-bomb makes the fails go down from 4147 to 895 :)

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 30th, 2013 at 21:06 and is filed under KDE. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “kjs finally under 1000 fails!”

  1. Louis M Says:
    January 31st, 2013 at 00:25

    So, now Konq will perform better than Rekonq (and Chromium?) at this test ! Great news :-D
    I’ve just tested and Reqonk scores 945 fails on Ubuntu 12.10 (using a recent Git snapshot).

  2. Louis M Says:
    January 31st, 2013 at 01:15

    Ooops ! Firefox 170, Chromium 9… And they are so faster, too…
    That meens you guys (and me too) will have work to do for a while. Not that bad, finally ;-)

  3. JanKusanagi Says:
    January 31st, 2013 at 01:27

    Great job, thanks!

    Konqueror with KHTML engine as primary browser here ;)

  4. Jonas Lihnell Says:
    January 31st, 2013 at 08:18

    Looks good, is there any plan on optimizations to get efficiency now that you achieved a good compatibility result?

  5. isemenov Says:
    January 31st, 2013 at 11:55

    Brave soul.. a few dozen Google engineers (which are, on average,10% short of a genius) have been and still are working on that task, honestly I don’t think you can replace them, but for a positive and productive pastime, why not code that! Wish you luck and not to lose steam along the way.

  6. DigitalFreedom Says:
    February 2nd, 2013 at 22:59

    Thank you for working on KJS. I still use Konqueror as my default browsers and I’m really happy when any of its part improves, especially KHTML and KJS. Keep up the great work.

Leave a Reply