Comments for bUscher http://buschinski.de Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:31:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 Comment on kjs now with more emscripten-qt fun! by buscher http://buschinski.de/2013/04/kjs-now-with-more-emscripten-qt-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-663 buscher Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:31:34 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=243#comment-663 I hope to get this in 4.11.0

]]> Comment on kjs now with more emscripten-qt fun! by Kevin Kofler http://buschinski.de/2013/04/kjs-now-with-more-emscripten-qt-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-661 Kevin Kofler Sat, 13 Apr 2013 01:16:13 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=243#comment-661 What release will this ship in? 4.10.3? 4.11.0? Later?

]]> Comment on kjs now with more emscripten-qt fun! by SSJ_GZ http://buschinski.de/2013/04/kjs-now-with-more-emscripten-qt-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-659 SSJ_GZ Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:18:02 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=243#comment-659 Excellent – this puts you ahead of QtWebkit (at least in the 4.8.x series of Qt), as far as I can tell!

]]> Comment on kjs finally under 1000 fails! by DigitalFreedom http://buschinski.de/2013/01/kjs-finally-under-1000-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-532 DigitalFreedom Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:59:23 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=220#comment-532 Thank you for working on KJS. I still use Konqueror as my default browsers and I’m really happy when any of its part improves, especially KHTML and KJS. Keep up the great work.

]]> Comment on kjs finally under 1000 fails! by isemenov http://buschinski.de/2013/01/kjs-finally-under-1000-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-528 isemenov Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:55:52 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=220#comment-528 Brave soul.. a few dozen Google engineers (which are, on average,10% short of a genius) have been and still are working on that task, honestly I don’t think you can replace them, but for a positive and productive pastime, why not code that! Wish you luck and not to lose steam along the way.

]]> Comment on kjs finally under 1000 fails! by Jonas Lihnell http://buschinski.de/2013/01/kjs-finally-under-1000-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-526 Jonas Lihnell Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:18:02 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=220#comment-526 Looks good, is there any plan on optimizations to get efficiency now that you achieved a good compatibility result?

]]> Comment on kjs finally under 1000 fails! by JanKusanagi http://buschinski.de/2013/01/kjs-finally-under-1000-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-525 JanKusanagi Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:27:27 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=220#comment-525 Great job, thanks!

Konqueror with KHTML engine as primary browser here ;)

]]> Comment on kjs finally under 1000 fails! by Louis M http://buschinski.de/2013/01/kjs-finally-under-1000-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-524 Louis M Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:15:28 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=220#comment-524 Ooops ! Firefox 170, Chromium 9… And they are so faster, too…
That meens you guys (and me too) will have work to do for a while. Not that bad, finally ;-)

]]> Comment on kjs finally under 1000 fails! by Louis M http://buschinski.de/2013/01/kjs-finally-under-1000-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-523 Louis M Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:25:39 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=220#comment-523 So, now Konq will perform better than Rekonq (and Chromium?) at this test ! Great news :-D
I’ve just tested and Reqonk scores 945 fails on Ubuntu 12.10 (using a recent Git snapshot).

]]> Comment on When I get bored… by nsrfgyuh http://buschinski.de/2012/06/when-i-get-bored/comment-page-1/#comment-514 nsrfgyuh Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:59:49 +0000 http://buschinski.de/?p=174#comment-514 Any chance for OTR support soon? :)

]]>